PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVN vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BVN vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVN achieves a 23.58% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BVN has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 13.54%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.


BVN

1D
2.01%
1M
-13.13%
YTD
23.58%
6M
22.13%
1Y
105.88%
3Y*
70.14%
5Y*
27.27%
10Y*
13.54%

EQT

1D
1.45%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
-5.35%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
3.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVN vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
23.58%147.96%-24.06%106.47%2.47%-39.95%-19.27%-6.40%15.91%25.66%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-2.55%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BVN and EQT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1996

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BVN:

$8.49B

EQT:

$32.47B

EPS

BVN:

$3.84

EQT:

$5.40

PE Ratio

BVN:

8.69

EQT:

9.61

PEG Ratio

BVN:

0.02

EQT:

0.08

PS Ratio

BVN:

4.15

EQT:

3.21

PB Ratio

BVN:

2.05

EQT:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BVN:

$2.05B

EQT:

$10.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BVN:

$1.06B

EQT:

$6.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

BVN:

$1.18B

EQT:

$7.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVN vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVN
BVN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVN vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVNEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.00

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

-0.22

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

-0.47

+9.23

BVN vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVN Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVN and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVN vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVN drawdown since its inception was -93.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVN and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVNEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.68%

-91.51%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.64%

-24.42%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.30%

-31.62%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.67%

-42.56%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.15%

-88.28%

+18.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.25%

-23.32%

-7.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.40%

-23.34%

-23.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.13%

11.47%

+0.66%

Volatility

BVN vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that BVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVNEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.09%

8.36%

+11.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.55%

21.09%

+21.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.28%

32.56%

+17.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.80%

42.79%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.95%

48.90%

-2.95%

Dividends

BVN vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

BVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than EQT's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
3.40%1.57%0.63%0.48%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.55%0.60%0.26%0.00%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.26%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%

Financials

BVN vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
622.46M
3.38B
(BVN) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BVN vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
57.3%
98.4%
Portfolio components
BVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a gross profit of 356.89M and revenue of 622.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

BVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported an operating income of 325.55M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

BVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a net income of 334.26M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BVN and EQT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVN has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVN dropped -93.68% vs EQT's -91.51%.

BVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVN and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer