BUYZ vs. OUSA
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. BUYZ is actively managed, while OUSA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -7.10%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 8.45% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -10.19%
- 1Y
- -12.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -7.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.84%
OUSA
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.78K | $15.43K | $16.35K | |
| $880.04K | $1.30M | $1.44M |
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -10.19% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 117.10% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 8.45% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 17.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and OUSA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BUYZ and OUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
OUSA
Communication Services
BUYZ
OUSA
Technology
BUYZ
OUSA
Financial Services
BUYZ
OUSA
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
OUSA
Industrials
BUYZ
OUSA
Real Estate
BUYZ
OUSA
-
Healthcare
BUYZ
OUSA
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
OUSA
-
Energy
BUYZ
-
OUSA
-
Utilities
BUYZ
-
OUSA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
OUSA
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUYZ | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.93 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 6.75 | -7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -33.12% | -34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -8.36% | -22.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -13.14% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.04% | -19.54% | -43.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.03% | 0.00% | -42.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.89% | -3.50% | -35.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.88% | 2.39% | +15.49% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.81%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 3.81% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | 8.12% | +10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 10.31% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.28% | 13.39% | +13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 15.20% | +14.58% |
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and OUSA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to OUSA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 9.18% vs -7.10% for BUYZ. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 9.18% return vs -7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer