BULD vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BULD tracks the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 18.64%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

BULD vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 34.29% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 31.64% return.

BULD

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 14.07%
• YTD: 34.29%
• 6M: 30.65%
• 1Y: 64.78%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 60.15%
• 3Y*: 33.48%
• 5Y*: 22.23%
• 10Y*: 25.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULD vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	34.29%	23.20%	-3.93%	28.27%	-12.41%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	31.64%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BULD and VGT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022	0.80

The correlation between BULD and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BULD vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULD

BULD Risk / Return Rank: 71
BULD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BULD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BULD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BULD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BULD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 76
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULD vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BULD	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.95	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.63	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.47	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	3.69	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	11.77	+1.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BULD vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULD and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BULD	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.95	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.68	-0.13

Drawdowns

BULD vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULD	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-54.63%	+26.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-16.40%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-27.23%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-1.48%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-7.95%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.88%	5.13%	-0.25%

Volatility

BULD vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BULD	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	6.39%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.34%	16.07%	+5.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.85%	20.57%	+7.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.73%	25.18%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.73%	24.60%	+3.13%

BULD vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BULD vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	0.92%	1.24%	0.18%	0.21%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BULD and VGT in my portfolio?

BULD and VGT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BULD or VGT?

BULD has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, BULD or VGT?

On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 18.64% for BULD. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BULD or VGT?

Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 18.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BULD or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BULD or VGT?

BULD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

What is the main difference between BULD and VGT?

BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.