BULD vs. BOIL
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - BULD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while BOIL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 21.51%/yr vs -66.38%/yr for BOIL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BOIL.
Performance
BULD vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 40.71% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -38.54% return.
BULD
- 1D
- 3.84%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 40.71%
- 6M
- 38.35%
- 1Y
- 66.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOIL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- -38.54%
- 6M
- -41.03%
- 1Y
- -71.62%
- 3Y*
- -66.38%
- 5Y*
- -66.45%
- 10Y*
- -57.86%
BULD vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 40.71% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -38.54% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -84.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and BOIL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | -0.00 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BULD and BOIL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
BOIL
BULD vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULD | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.91 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | -0.93 | +5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | -1.28 | +14.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULD vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and BOIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -100.00% | +72.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -77.43% | +61.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -96.86% | +69.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -100.00% | +98.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -93.59% | +85.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 56.14% | -51.21% |
Volatility
BULD vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is 12.06%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 22.76%. This indicates that BULD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | 22.76% | -10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.79% | 104.19% | -80.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.76% | 113.02% | -83.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.10% | 118.93% | -90.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.10% | 101.81% | -73.71% |
BULD vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULD vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.82% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and BOIL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOIL has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to BULD (12.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs BOIL's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 21.51% vs -66.38% for BOIL. On fees, BULD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BULD has been the lower-risk option at 12.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 21.51% return vs -66.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BULD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.
BULD has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.
BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOIL is Oil & Gas. BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 1.31% for BOIL.
BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and BOIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer