PortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. SCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and SCO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

BOIL vs. SCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-99.00%-98.00%-97.00%-96.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-100.00%
-96.63%
BOIL
SCO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BOIL:

-0.32

SCO:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

BOIL:

0.21

SCO:

1.09

Omega Ratio

BOIL:

1.02

SCO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

BOIL:

-0.34

SCO:

0.26

Martin Ratio

BOIL:

-0.71

SCO:

1.75

Ulcer Index

BOIL:

48.59%

SCO:

14.94%

Daily Std Dev

BOIL:

107.29%

SCO:

49.56%

Max Drawdown

BOIL:

-100.00%

SCO:

-99.50%

Current Drawdown

BOIL:

-100.00%

SCO:

-99.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -12.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCO's 16.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed SCO with an annualized return of -56.55%, while SCO has yielded a comparatively higher -29.07% annualized return.


BOIL

YTD

-12.59%

1M

-34.68%

6M

3.15%

1Y

-28.14%

5Y*

-60.32%

10Y*

-56.55%

SCO

YTD

16.43%

1M

13.87%

6M

13.28%

1Y

27.84%

5Y*

-53.54%

10Y*

-29.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOIL vs. SCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BOIL: current value is 1.31%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BOIL: 1.31%
Expense ratio chart for SCO: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SCO: 0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOIL vs. SCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BOIL is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BOIL is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BOIL is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BOIL is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BOIL is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BOIL is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCO is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCO is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCO is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCO is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCO is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BOIL vs. SCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BOIL, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BOIL: -0.32
SCO: 0.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for BOIL, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BOIL: 0.21
SCO: 1.09
The chart of Omega ratio for BOIL, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BOIL: 1.02
SCO: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for BOIL, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BOIL: -0.34
SCO: 0.26
The chart of Martin ratio for BOIL, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BOIL: -0.71
SCO: 1.75

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and SCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.32
0.53
BOIL
SCO

Dividends

BOIL vs. SCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOIL nor SCO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. SCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SCO drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and SCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-99.80%-99.60%-99.40%-99.20%-99.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-100.00%
-99.13%
BOIL
SCO

Volatility

BOIL vs. SCO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 34.81% compared to ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) at 23.53%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
34.81%
23.53%
BOIL
SCO