BOIL vs. LNG

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a 0.00% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -55.81%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and LNG.

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 34.76% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 5.70%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.