BOIL vs. UNL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL).
BOIL and UNL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOIL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas Subindex (200%). It was launched on Oct 4, 2011. UNL is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the 12 Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Nov 18, 2009. Both BOIL and UNL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BOIL vs. UNL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOIL vs. UNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -29.61% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -67.70% | -20.55% | -65.72% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -6.50% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | 47.01% | 54.42% | -9.54% | -18.78% | 12.53% | -21.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -29.61% return, which is significantly lower than UNL's -6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed UNL with an annualized return of -55.56%, while UNL has yielded a comparatively higher -2.45% annualized return.
BOIL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -29.61%
- 6M
- -46.25%
- 1Y
- -81.20%
- 3Y*
- -64.52%
- 5Y*
- -62.47%
- 10Y*
- -55.56%
UNL
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- -32.68%
- 3Y*
- -15.85%
- 5Y*
- -2.73%
- 10Y*
- -2.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOIL vs. UNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than UNL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOIL vs. UNL — Risk / Return Rank
BOIL
UNL
BOIL vs. UNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOIL | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -0.84 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | -1.06 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.86 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.87 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.41 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOIL | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.84 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | -0.07 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | -0.07 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.39 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOIL and UNL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOIL vs. UNL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOIL nor UNL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BOIL vs. UNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than UNL's maximum drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and UNL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOIL | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -88.52% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.53% | -36.28% | -45.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.88% | -77.17% | -22.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -77.17% | -22.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -87.78% | -12.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -73.19% | -20.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.91% | 22.58% | +38.33% |
Volatility
BOIL vs. UNL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 29.44% compared to United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) at 11.08%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOIL | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.44% | 11.08% | +18.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.34% | 32.23% | +77.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.51% | 39.10% | +81.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.61% | 41.68% | +76.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.94% | 33.81% | +68.13% |