PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.


BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and CIBR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFX

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFX vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFX vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFXCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.68

0.67

+2.02

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-33.89%

+31.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-2.81%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-8.66%

+8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

Volatility

BUFX vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

24.50%

-20.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

24.95%

-20.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

23.60%

-19.62%

BUFX vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and CIBR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.60% for CIBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer