PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 26.02% return.


BUFX

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.65%
6M
4.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-4.70%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
26.02%
6M
29.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and AFOS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFX vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFXAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.51

3.75

-1.24

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-11.52%

+8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-4.83%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-1.38%

+1.14%

Volatility

BUFX vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

20.74%

-16.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

20.74%

-16.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

20.74%

-16.72%

BUFX vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and AFOS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AFOS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer