BUFH vs. FNDB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.

Performance

BUFH vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 14.46% return.

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 14.46%
• 6M: 14.53%
• 1Y: 32.19%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.46%	13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and FNDB is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

BUFH vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 88
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFH vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFH	FNDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.91	0.79	+2.12

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and FNDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFH	FNDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-38.17%	+36.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.15%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-3.66%	+3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUFH	FNDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	10.72%	-8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.37%	15.36%	-12.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.37%	17.48%	-15.11%

BUFH vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFH vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFH and FNDB in my portfolio?

BUFH and FNDB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUFH or FNDB?

On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFH or FNDB?

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFH or FNDB?

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between BUFH and FNDB?

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.25% for FNDB.