BTT vs. SCHG
BTT (Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, BTT returned 2.62%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTT achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BTT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 2.62%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
BTT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 7.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
BTT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTT Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust | 0.34% | 13.71% | 1.64% | 0.76% | -15.16% | 3.94% | 9.51% | 21.85% | -4.63% | 6.52% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTT and SCHG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2012 | 0.12 |
The correlation between BTT and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
BTT
SCHG
BTT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.10 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 3.58 | +5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTT drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTT and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -34.59% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -16.41% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -23.39% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -34.59% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | -34.59% | +11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -6.46% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -5.20% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 5.02% | -4.17% |
Volatility
BTT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) is 1.22%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that BTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 5.91% | -4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 12.52% | -8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 16.24% | -10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 22.38% | -14.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.72% | 21.58% | -11.86% |
Dividends
BTT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
BTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTT Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 3.11% | 3.50% | 2.89% | 2.92% | 3.10% | 3.93% | 4.08% | 4.40% | 4.46% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to BTT (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTT dropped -30.71% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
BTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTT and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer