BTT vs. BINC
BTT (Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust) is a stock, while BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 3 years, BTT returned 5.66%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for BINC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTT vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTT achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's 1.29% return.
BTT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 7.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
BINC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTT vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTT Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust | 0.34% | 13.71% | 1.64% | 1.12% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.29% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTT and BINC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BTT and BINC shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTT vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
BTT
BINC
BTT vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTT | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.06 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 8.04 | +1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTT vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTT drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTT and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTT | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -2.69% | -28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.69% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -2.69% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -0.10% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -0.36% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.69% | +0.16% |
Volatility
BTT vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.58%. This indicates that BTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTT | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.58% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 1.88% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 2.30% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 2.99% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.72% | 2.99% | +6.73% |
Dividends
BTT vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
BTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than BINC's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTT Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 3.11% | 3.50% | 2.89% | 2.92% | 3.10% | 3.93% | 4.08% | 4.40% | 4.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTT and BINC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTT has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BINC (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTT dropped -30.71% vs BINC's -2.69%.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTT and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer