PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTT vs. MUB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTT and MUB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BTT vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.22%
-0.34%
BTT
MUB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTT:

0.27

MUB:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

BTT:

0.40

MUB:

0.55

Omega Ratio

BTT:

1.05

MUB:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

BTT:

0.09

MUB:

0.33

Martin Ratio

BTT:

0.57

MUB:

1.31

Ulcer Index

BTT:

2.74%

MUB:

1.13%

Daily Std Dev

BTT:

5.76%

MUB:

3.88%

Max Drawdown

BTT:

-30.71%

MUB:

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

BTT:

-12.14%

MUB:

-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTT achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BTT has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 3.25%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.


BTT

YTD

2.41%

1M

2.22%

6M

0.21%

1Y

1.26%

5Y*

-0.16%

10Y*

3.25%

MUB

YTD

-0.01%

1M

-0.13%

6M

-0.34%

1Y

1.44%

5Y*

0.68%

10Y*

1.91%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTT vs. MUB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTT is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTT is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTT is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTT is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTT is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUB is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUB is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUB is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUB is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUB is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUB is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTT vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTT, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.270.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTT, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.400.55
The chart of Omega ratio for BTT, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.051.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTT, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.090.33
The chart of Martin ratio for BTT, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.000.571.31
BTT
MUB

The current BTT Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTT and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.27
0.38
BTT
MUB

Dividends

BTT vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

BTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than MUB's 2.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTT
Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust
2.62%2.68%3.09%3.49%2.87%2.90%3.08%3.92%4.08%4.40%4.46%5.20%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
2.76%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%2.73%

Drawdowns

BTT vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTT drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTT and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-12.14%
-1.61%
BTT
MUB

Volatility

BTT vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 1.15%. This indicates that BTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.39%
1.15%
BTT
MUB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab