PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMR vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMR vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 40.73% return.


BSMR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*

XES

1D
1.32%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
40.73%
6M
41.57%
1Y
73.41%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
-3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
1.31%3.10%1.51%4.47%-7.60%1.09%4.97%0.16%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
40.73%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and XES is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

-0.04

The correlation between BSMR and XES shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMR vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMRXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.37

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.07

4.91

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.27

17.76

+4.51

BSMR vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMRXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-95.65%

+82.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.57%

-15.03%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-45.95%

+42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-45.95%

+33.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-72.82%

+72.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-54.39%

+50.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

4.22%

-4.04%

Volatility

BSMR vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.42%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMRXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

10.34%

-9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

20.79%

-19.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28%

31.22%

-29.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

39.01%

-35.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.70%

45.00%

-39.30%

BSMR vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMR vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than XES's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.95%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.48%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMR and XES have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to BSMR (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 5-year performance, XES leads with 13.23% vs 0.55% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XES has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 0.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.48% for XES.

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XES is Energy Equities. BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.35% for XES.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMR and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer