BSMR vs. SCMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB).
BSMR and SCMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSMR is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. Both BSMR and SCMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSMR vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSMR vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.62% | 3.10% | 1.51% | 4.47% | 2.63% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | -0.51% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's -0.51% return.
BSMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSMR vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSMR vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
BSMR
SCMB
BSMR vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMR | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.22 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.05 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 2.98 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMR | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.90 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMR and SCMB is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSMR vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than SCMB's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.14% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSMR vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and SCMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMR | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -6.13% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -3.79% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -2.42% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -1.32% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 1.34% | -0.80% |
Volatility
BSMR vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.41%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSMR | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 1.47% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 2.02% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 4.15% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 4.22% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 4.22% | +1.58% |