PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XES

1D
-3.31%
1M
-15.10%
YTD
34.60%
6M
35.81%
1Y
73.84%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
-3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
0.00%2.27%2.46%3.14%-5.09%0.60%4.91%0.62%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
34.60%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and XES is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

-0.04

The correlation between BSMP and XES shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMPXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

BSMP vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

Volatility

BSMP vs. XES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.97%

BSMP vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMP vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than XES's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.05%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.19%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and XES have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.05% for BSMP.

BSMP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XES is Energy Equities. BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.35% for XES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer