PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. OVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OVM

1D
0.29%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.13%
6M
4.81%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
0.00%2.27%2.46%3.14%-5.09%0.60%4.91%0.66%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
4.13%4.14%3.42%7.35%-11.26%4.22%6.17%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and OVM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between BSMP and OVM has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSMP vs. OVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMP
OVM

Financial Services

50.3%
11.8%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.9%

Industrials

0.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
10.1%

Communication Services

0.0%
11.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

BSMP
50.3%
OVM
11.8%

Real Estate

BSMP
2.7%
OVM
1.9%

Industrials

BSMP
0.4%
OVM
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMP
0.0%
OVM
10.1%

Communication Services

BSMP
0.0%
OVM
11.2%

Basic Materials

BSMP

-

OVM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSMP

-

OVM
4.9%

Energy

BSMP

-

OVM
3.5%

Healthcare

BSMP

-

OVM
8.5%

Technology

BSMP

-

OVM
35.6%

Utilities

BSMP

-

OVM
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSMP vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMPOVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPOVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

Volatility

BSMP vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPOVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

BSMP vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMP vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than OVM's 6.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.27%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
6.10%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and OVM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 1.27% for BSMP.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.82% for OVM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and OVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer