PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENIC vs. CICOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENIC vs. CICOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC) and COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd. (CICOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENIC achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than CICOY's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ENIC has underperformed CICOY with an annualized return of 3.73%, while CICOY has yielded a comparatively higher 30.59% annualized return.


ENIC

1D
-0.22%
1M
8.06%
YTD
18.58%
6M
20.68%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
3.73%

CICOY

1D
1.38%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
0.95%
6M
3.51%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
38.59%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
30.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENIC vs. CICOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENIC
Enel Chile S.A.
18.58%48.47%-3.58%62.00%26.20%-49.96%-12.51%0.87%-9.09%28.60%
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
0.95%24.88%67.52%30.61%-26.18%101.00%206.97%3.08%-23.83%45.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ENIC and CICOY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016

0.10

Fundamentals

EPS

ENIC:

$0.44

CICOY:

CN¥16.04

PE Ratio

ENIC:

10.45

CICOY:

3.66

PEG Ratio

ENIC:

0.00

CICOY:

1.00

PS Ratio

ENIC:

1.36

CICOY:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENIC:

$3.49B

CICOY:

CN¥241.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENIC:

$1.28B

CICOY:

CN¥68.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

ENIC:

$1.19B

CICOY:

CN¥66.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENIC vs. CICOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENIC
ENIC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ENIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ENIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CICOY
CICOY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CICOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICOY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CICOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICOY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENIC vs. CICOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC) and COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd. (CICOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENICCICOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

0.33

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

0.81

+5.21

ENIC vs. CICOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the CICOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENIC and CICOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENIC vs. CICOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENIC drawdown since its inception was -79.74%, smaller than the maximum CICOY drawdown of -83.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENIC and CICOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENICCICOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.74%

-83.95%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-19.79%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-35.47%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.21%

-53.66%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.74%

-63.37%

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-13.03%

+10.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.35%

-49.54%

+20.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

7.90%

-2.00%

Volatility

ENIC vs. CICOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC) is 7.57%, while COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd. (CICOY) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that ENIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENICCICOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

13.95%

-6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

23.76%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

31.82%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.18%

46.09%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.79%

52.07%

-16.28%

Dividends

ENIC vs. CICOY - Dividend Comparison

ENIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than CICOY's 8.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.
8.24%12.09%6.51%26.39%40.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENIC
Enel Chile S.A.
4.27%5.56%8.55%10.38%1.00%12.08%6.54%4.88%4.97%2.76%2.46%

Financials

ENIC vs. CICOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enel Chile S.A. and COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co., Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
1.20B
51.14B
(ENIC) Total Revenue
(CICOY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ENIC values in USD, CICOY values in CNY

Frequently Asked Questions


ENIC and CICOY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CICOY has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to ENIC (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENIC dropped -79.74% vs CICOY's -83.95%.

ENIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENIC and CICOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer