PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BROL vs. BCTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BROL vs. BCTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BROL

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.15%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCTK

1D
-3.03%
1M
2.49%
6M
17.40%
YTD
20.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BROL vs. BCTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BROL and BCTK is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BROL vs. BCTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BROL vs. BCTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BROL vs. BCTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BROL drawdown since its inception was -4.67%, smaller than the maximum BCTK drawdown of -13.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BROL and BCTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BROLBCTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-13.96%

+9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-6.77%

+6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-3.26%

+1.83%

Volatility

BROL vs. BCTK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BROLBCTKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

31.01%

-13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

31.01%

-13.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

31.01%

-13.84%

BROL vs. BCTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BROL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BCTK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BROL vs. BCTK - Dividend Comparison

Neither BROL nor BCTK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BROL and BCTK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BROL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BROL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

BROL and BCTK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BROL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BCTK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BROL and 0.75% for BCTK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BROL and BCTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer