PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPH vs. ARMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BPH

1D
1.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMH

1D
-7.59%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BPH and ARMH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BPH vs. ARMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPH vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and ARMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPHARMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-24.85%

+15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-7.59%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-7.21%

+4.32%

Volatility

BPH vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPHARMHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.73%

117.89%

-93.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.73%

117.89%

-93.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

117.89%

-93.16%

BPH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BPH and ARMH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BPH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BPH and ARMH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH and ARMH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while ARMH is Technology Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPH and ARMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer