BPH vs. UNG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while UNG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas Futures. BPH is actively managed, while UNG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for UNG.

Performance

BPH vs. UNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNG

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: -6.20%
• 6M: -10.85%
• 1Y: -31.71%
• 3Y*: -27.52%
• 5Y*: -24.87%
• 10Y*: -21.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. UNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP	5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and UNG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.08

Return for Risk

BPH vs. UNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNG

UNG Risk / Return Rank: 4
UNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
UNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
UNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
UNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
UNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPH	UNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.94	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.80	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.25	—

Drawdowns

BPH vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and UNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	UNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-99.88%	+90.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-68.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-93.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.71%	-99.86%	+91.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-89.97%	+86.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	UNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	60.39%	-36.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.10%	64.14%	-40.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.10%	54.80%	-30.70%

BPH vs. UNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UNG's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPH vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison

BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and UNG in my portfolio?

BPH and UNG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or UNG?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or UNG?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for UNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or UNG?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for UNG.

What is the main difference between BPH and UNG?

BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while UNG is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 1.17% for UNG.