BPH vs. DBO
BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. BPH is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
BPH vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BPH
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -18.58%
- YTD
- 50.16%
- 6M
- 47.74%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
BPH vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -5.53% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | -18.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPH and DBO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPH vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO
BPH vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPH vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -90.18% | +80.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -60.48% | +51.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -62.22% | +59.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility
BPH vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 34.89% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 32.54% | -8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 31.81% | -7.71% |
BPH vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPH vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than DBO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.34% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPH and DBO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.
BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for BPH and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer