BOTZ vs. HUMN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. BOTZ is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.

Performance

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than HUMN's 21.30% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 5.91%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 26.87%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: —

HUMN

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 24.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	5.91%	15.65%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	21.30%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and HUMN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.85

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOTZ	HUMN
Industrials	49.3%	34.9%
Technology	31.8%	25.7%
Healthcare	8.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	19.6%
Communication Services	4.4%	2.1%
Financial Services	0.9%	-1.0%
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	7.3%
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 28
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTZ	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	—	—

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-20.40%	-35.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.83%	-6.94%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.27%	-4.60%	-13.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.23%	30.73%	-5.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	30.73%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.80%	30.73%	-4.93%

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than HUMN's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.62%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.60%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ and HUMN in my portfolio?

BOTZ and HUMN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ or HUMN?

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ or HUMN?

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTZ or HUMN?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.60% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between BOTZ and HUMN?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.75% for HUMN.