PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. CROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 45.83% return.


BOTZ

1D
-0.38%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.47%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

CROX

1D
-0.92%
1M
28.36%
YTD
45.83%
6M
38.71%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
28.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
2.46%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
45.83%-21.92%17.26%-13.85%-15.43%104.63%49.58%61.24%105.54%84.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and CROX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between BOTZ and CROX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CROX
CROX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZCROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.63

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

1.06

+2.19

BOTZ vs. CROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and CROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and CROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZCROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-98.74%

+43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-32.54%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-54.04%

+25.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-73.86%

+18.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-30.94%

+20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-61.29%

+43.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

19.16%

-13.32%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 8.89%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZCROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

12.30%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

32.47%

-12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

52.96%

-27.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

55.19%

-28.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

56.00%

-30.21%

Dividends

BOTZ vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.64%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and CROX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CROX has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to BOTZ (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs CROX's -98.74%.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and CROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer