BOTT vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTT is a Robotics fund tracking the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. BOTT is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

BOTT vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 44.22% return.

BOTT

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 6M: 21.97%
• 1Y: 72.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 44.22%
• 6M: 48.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	17.49%	31.94%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	44.22%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and SGRT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 55
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTT	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	—	—

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-17.87%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.37%	-4.78%	-16.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-3.24%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.77%	34.85%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.47%	34.85%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.47%	34.85%	-1.38%

BOTT vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTT vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.12%	0.14%	1.74%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTT and SGRT in my portfolio?

BOTT and SGRT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTT or SGRT?

On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTT or SGRT?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTT or SGRT?

BOTT and SGRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.12%.

What is the main difference between BOTT and SGRT?

BOTT is categorized as Robotics, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BOTT and 0.59% for SGRT.