BNKD vs. MSII
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while MSII is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. BNKD is passively managed, while MSII is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.69% vs -67.78% for MSII. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSII.
Performance
BNKD vs. MSII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than MSII's -18.95% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.32%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -36.58%
- 1Y
- -69.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSII
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -31.87%
- YTD
- -18.95%
- 6M
- -32.47%
- 1Y
- -67.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKD vs. MSII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -28.25% | -57.75% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -18.95% | -60.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and MSII is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. MSII — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
MSII
BNKD vs. MSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.96 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. MSII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than MSII's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and MSII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -78.73% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.14% | -78.73% | +8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.90% | -73.68% | -12.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -46.27% | -17.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.49% | — | — |
Volatility
BNKD vs. MSII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 71.12% | -12.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 71.12% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 71.12% | +3.47% |
BNKD vs. MSII - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. MSII - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 88.00% | 48.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and MSII have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, MSII leads with -67.78% vs -69.69% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSII has performed better with a -67.78% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 88.00%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MSII is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.99% for MSII.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and MSII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer