PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSII vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSII vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSII

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B

MSII vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
-28.10%-61.03%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MSII and QQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSII vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSII vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSIIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

MSII vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSII vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSIIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

Volatility

MSII vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSIIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

MSII vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSII vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MSII has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
60.40%48.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSII and QQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.

MSII has the higher dividend yield at 60.40%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

MSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSII and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer