PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSII vs. IMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSII vs. IMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSII achieves a -28.10% return, which is significantly lower than IMST's -25.05% return.


MSII

1D
0.00%
1M
-30.37%
YTD
-28.10%
6M
-30.19%
1Y
-70.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IMST

1D
-1.74%
1M
-26.67%
YTD
-25.05%
6M
-27.13%
1Y
-66.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSII vs. IMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
-28.10%-61.03%
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
-25.05%-55.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MSII and IMST is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.95

The correlation between MSII and IMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSII vs. IMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSII
MSII Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSII Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSII Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

IMST
IMST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMST Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMST Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSII vs. IMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSIIIMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.77

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.94

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.36

+0.08

MSII vs. IMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSII Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the IMST Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSII and IMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSII vs. IMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSII drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than IMST's maximum drawdown of -70.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSII and IMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSIIIMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.73%

-70.68%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.73%

-70.68%

-8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.65%

-70.68%

-5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-36.57%

-10.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.34%

48.73%

+6.61%

Volatility

MSII vs. IMST - Volatility Comparison

REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) has a higher volatility of 21.17% compared to Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) at 17.47%. This indicates that MSII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSIIIMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.17%

17.47%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.72%

44.16%

+12.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.96%

58.04%

+13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.62%

59.62%

+11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

59.62%

+11.00%

MSII vs. IMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSII and IMST have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MSII vs. IMST - Dividend Comparison

MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.58%, less than IMST's 251.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025
IMST
Bitwise Funds Trust
251.60%195.93%
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
97.58%48.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MSII and IMST move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSII has higher volatility (21.17%) compared to IMST (17.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSII dropped -78.73% vs IMST's -70.68%.

On 1-year performance, IMST leads with -66.17% vs -70.57% for MSII. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, IMST has been the lower-risk option at 17.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IMST has performed better with a -66.17% return vs -70.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSII and IMST have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

IMST has the higher dividend yield at 251.60%, compared with 97.58% for MSII.

MSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IMST is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and Bitwise.

MSII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSII and IMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer