PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSII vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSII vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSII

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MSTU

1D
-8.33%
1M
-18.14%
6M
-76.72%
YTD
-78.82%
1Y
-97.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-75.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$207.37M$183.22M$204.16M

MSII vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
-28.10%-61.03%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-78.82%-89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MSII and MSTU is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.90

The correlation between MSII and MSTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSII vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSII vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSIIMSTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

MSII vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSII vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSIIMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.95%

Volatility

MSII vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSIIMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

119.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.54%

MSII vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSII vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSII nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
MSII
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF
60.40%48.93%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSII and MSTU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

MSII has the higher dividend yield at 60.40%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

They also come from different issuers: REX and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 1.05% for MSTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSII and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer