BNKD vs. EMTY
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - BNKD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.69% vs 1.97% for EMTY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.
Performance
BNKD vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.98% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.32%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -36.58%
- 1Y
- -69.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTY
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- -4.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.70%
- 10Y*
- —
BNKD vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -28.25% | -62.08% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 1.98% | -2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and EMTY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
EMTY
BNKD vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.03 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.14 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 0.24 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.20 | 0.11 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.43 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and EMTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -77.62% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.14% | -14.00% | -56.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.90% | -74.55% | -11.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -54.02% | -10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.49% | 8.11% | +41.38% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) at 6.05%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 6.05% | +11.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.63% | 12.41% | +34.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 17.65% | +40.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 22.36% | +52.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 25.67% | +48.92% |
BNKD vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.42% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and EMTY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNKD has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to EMTY (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -85.90% vs EMTY's -77.62%.
On 1-year performance, EMTY leads with 1.97% vs -69.69% for BNKD. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMTY has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.
EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.66% for EMTY.
EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and EMTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer