EMTY vs. RWM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) and RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%) while RWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMTY returned -2.54%/yr vs -5.30%/yr for RWM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMTY charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RWM.

Performance

EMTY vs. RWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTY achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than RWM's -16.29% return.

EMTY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: -0.49%
• 3Y*: -3.59%
• 5Y*: -2.54%
• 10Y*: —

RWM

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: -16.29%
• 6M: -14.25%
• 1Y: -27.19%
• 3Y*: -13.21%
• 5Y*: -5.30%
• 10Y*: -12.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMTY vs. RWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	0.39%	-1.76%	-4.13%	0.27%	4.32%	-37.39%	-31.92%	-8.65%	11.16%	-15.97%
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000	-16.29%	-9.40%	-5.91%	-10.43%	18.34%	-17.90%	-31.04%	-19.83%	11.57%	-4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EMTY and RWM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017	0.73

The correlation between EMTY and RWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMTY vs. RWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTY

EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 8
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RWM

RWM Risk / Return Rank: 0
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMTY vs. RWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMTY	RWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	-1.39	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	-2.01	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.78	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	-0.98	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	-1.74	+1.67

EMTY vs. RWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the RWM Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTY and RWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMTY vs. RWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTY drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, smaller than the maximum RWM drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTY and RWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMTY	RWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.62%	-95.58%	+17.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.91%	-27.70%	+13.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.83%	-42.69%	+11.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-42.69%	+11.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.94%	-95.54%	+20.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.39%	-74.08%	+19.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.26%	15.76%	-8.50%

Volatility

EMTY vs. RWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) is 5.20%, while ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that EMTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMTY	RWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	6.51%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	14.28%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	19.61%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.36%	22.64%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.63%	23.14%	+2.49%

EMTY vs. RWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RWM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMTY vs. RWM - Dividend Comparison

EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than RWM's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	3.47%	3.83%	6.00%	4.41%	0.65%	0.00%	0.07%	0.82%	0.62%	0.03%
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000	4.24%	3.97%	6.03%	4.78%	0.39%	0.00%	0.20%	1.55%	0.87%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMTY and RWM in my portfolio?

EMTY and RWM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMTY or RWM?

RWM has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to EMTY (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTY dropped -77.62% vs RWM's -95.58%.

Which ETF is better, EMTY or RWM?

On 5-year performance, EMTY leads with -2.54% vs -5.30% for RWM. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMTY or RWM?

Over the 5-year period, EMTY has performed better with a -2.54% return vs -5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMTY or RWM?

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMTY or RWM?

RWM has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.47% for EMTY.

What is the main difference between EMTY and RWM?

EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%), while RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.66% for EMTY and 0.95% for RWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.