BNDW vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNDW returned 0.22%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for VGT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDW charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

BNDW vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDW achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.

BNDW

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 60.15%
• 3Y*: 33.48%
• 5Y*: 22.23%
• 10Y*: 25.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDW vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	0.42%	5.02%	2.42%	7.18%	-12.88%	-2.10%	6.22%	8.37%	1.21%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	31.64%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	-15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDW and VGT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018	0.10

The correlation between BNDW and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNDW vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNDW	VGT
Technology	100.0%	98.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNDW vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 27
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 76
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDW vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNDW	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	2.95	-1.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	3.63	-2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.47	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	3.69	-2.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.70	11.77	-8.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNDW vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDW and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNDW	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	2.95	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.89	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.68	-0.31

Drawdowns

BNDW vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDW drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDW and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDW	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	-54.63%	+37.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-16.40%	+13.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.27%	-27.23%	+22.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	-35.07%	+18.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-1.48%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-7.95%	+2.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	5.13%	-4.18%

Volatility

BNDW vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) is 1.31%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that BNDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNDW	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	6.39%	-5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	16.07%	-13.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	20.57%	-17.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.21%	25.18%	-19.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.90%	24.60%	-19.70%

BNDW vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDW has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BNDW vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.21%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNDW and VGT in my portfolio?

BNDW and VGT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNDW or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to BNDW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDW dropped -17.22% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, BNDW or VGT?

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 22.23% vs 0.22% for BNDW. On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BNDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNDW or VGT?

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 22.23% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNDW or VGT?

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNDW or VGT?

BNDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

What is the main difference between BNDW and VGT?

BNDW is categorized as Global Bonds, while VGT is Technology Equities. BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDW and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.