PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDW vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDW vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDW vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
0.09%5.02%2.42%7.18%-12.88%-2.10%6.22%8.37%1.21%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.09%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%1.06%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BNDW at 0.09% and BND at 0.09%.


BNDW

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*

BND

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDW vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDW has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BNDW vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDW vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDWBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.93

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.75

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.95

4.78

+0.16

BNDW vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDW and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDWBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.93

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.04

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BNDW and BND is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BNDW vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than BND's 3.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.18%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.93%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Drawdowns

BNDW vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDW drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDW and BND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDWBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-18.58%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.44%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-17.91%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.54%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-3.07%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.90%

-0.17%

Volatility

BNDW vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.67% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDWBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

1.63%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

2.52%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

4.30%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

6.00%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

5.52%

-0.60%