PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDW vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDW vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDW vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
-0.03%5.02%2.42%7.18%-12.88%-2.10%6.22%8.37%1.21%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-1.71%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-11.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDW achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly higher than VT's -1.71% return.


BNDW

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.57%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*

VT

1D
3.08%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
1.42%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDW vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDW has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BNDW vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDW vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDWVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.25

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.84

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.83

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.97

8.51

-3.53

BNDW vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDW and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDWVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.25

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.58

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.40

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between BNDW and VT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNDW vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VT's 1.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.16%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.82%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

BNDW vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDW drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDW and VT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDWVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-50.27%

+33.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-11.84%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-26.38%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-6.89%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-7.08%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

2.55%

-1.83%

Volatility

BNDW vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) is 1.66%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that BNDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDWVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

6.33%

-4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

9.95%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

17.24%

-13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

15.98%

-10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

17.20%

-12.28%