BNDW vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
BNDW and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Float Adjusted TR Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. Both BNDW and AGG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BNDW or AGG.
Key characteristics
| BNDW | AGG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.01% | -2.98% |
| 1Y Return | 2.15% | -0.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.85% | -3.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.03% | -0.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.34 | -0.09 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.72% | 6.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.21% | -18.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.42% | -12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDW and AGG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BNDW vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BNDW achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's -2.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNDW vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDW has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BNDW vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BNDW vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than AGG's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 3.98% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.40% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
BNDW vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDW drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDW and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BNDW vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) is 1.54%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that BNDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.