BNDP vs. VYM
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
BNDP vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 13.44% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
BNDP vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.11% | 0.08% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 13.44% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and VYM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VYM
BNDP vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -56.98% | +54.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -0.12% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -7.16% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 10.28% | -6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 13.90% | -10.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 16.29% | -12.59% |
BNDP vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than VYM's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.26% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and VYM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for BNDP.
BNDP has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.26% for VYM.
BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VYM is Dividend. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.04% for VYM.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer