BNDP vs. IMTB
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index while IMTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.
Performance
BNDP vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's -0.69% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IMTB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.98K | $475.70K | $762.42K | |
| $2.15M | $1.45M | $1.46M |
BNDP vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.46% | 0.08% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.69% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and IMTB is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IMTB
BNDP vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and IMTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -18.15% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.40% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -4.09% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 4.13% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 6.32% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 5.17% | -1.52% |
BNDP vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than IMTB's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.47% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.18% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, BNDP and IMTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 2.47% for BNDP.
BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.06% for IMTB.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and IMTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer