BNDP vs. IMTB
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index while IMTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.
Performance
BNDP vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's 0.27% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.52% | 0.08% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.27% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and IMTB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IMTB
BNDP vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and IMTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -18.15% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.45% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -4.12% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.98% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 4.10% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 6.30% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 5.18% | -1.48% |
BNDP vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than IMTB's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.07% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.51% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and IMTB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 2.07% for BNDP.
BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.06% for IMTB.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and IMTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer