PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDP vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDP vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.22% return.


BNDP

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDP vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDP and VCIT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDP vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDP vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDPVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

BNDP vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDP vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDPVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-20.56%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.32%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-3.15%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

BNDP vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDPVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

4.11%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

6.62%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.71%

6.29%

-2.58%

BNDP vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDP vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
2.08%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BNDP and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for BNDP.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.

BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.03% for VCIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDP and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer