BNDP vs. VUG
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
BNDP vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 3.52% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 18.02%
BNDP vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.52% | 0.08% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 3.52% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and VUG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VUG
BNDP vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -50.68% | +48.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -6.88% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -7.09% | +6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 16.91% | -13.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 22.39% | -18.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 21.51% | -17.81% |
BNDP vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.07% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and VUG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for BNDP.
BNDP has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer