BNDP vs. VIG
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
BNDP vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 7.57% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
BNDP vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.57% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and VIG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
VIG
BNDP vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDP | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.60 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -46.81% | +44.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.19% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -5.51% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63% | 10.01% | -6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 14.23% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 16.05% | -12.42% |
BNDP vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and VIG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for BNDP.
BNDP has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VIG is Dividend. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.04% for VIG.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer