BNDP vs. FTBFX
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. BNDP is passively managed, while FTBFX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.
Performance
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's 0.28% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.11% | 0.08% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 0.28% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and FTBFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTBFX
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and FTBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -18.25% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.59% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -2.31% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.74% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 5.67% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 4.74% | -1.04% |
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDP vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than FTBFX's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.37% | 4.36% | 4.15% | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.19% | 2.97% | 3.61% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BNDP and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and FTBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer