BMR vs. VUG
BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share) is a stock, while VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 3 years, BMR returned -17.21%/yr vs 23.62%/yr for VUG. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMR vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMR achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.76% return.
BMR
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- -13.98%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -22.71%
- 1Y
- -49.53%
- 3Y*
- -17.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
BMR vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | 1.91% | -68.09% | 239.31% | -63.20% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.76% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 34.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMR and VUG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between BMR and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMR vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
BMR
VUG
BMR vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMR | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.25 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.46 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 4.99 | -6.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMR vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMR drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMR and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMR | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -50.68% | -41.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.03% | -16.53% | -46.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.80% | -22.85% | -68.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.06% | -4.86% | -85.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.58% | -7.09% | -65.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.48% | 4.82% | +34.66% |
Volatility
BMR vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) has a higher volatility of 22.38% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.55%. This indicates that BMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMR | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.38% | 6.55% | +15.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.90% | 13.32% | +36.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.12% | 16.80% | +49.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 240.42% | 22.36% | +218.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 240.42% | 21.53% | +218.89% |
Dividends
BMR vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
BMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMR and VUG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMR has higher volatility (22.38%) compared to VUG (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMR dropped -91.80% vs VUG's -50.68%.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMR and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer