BMR vs. FSPSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share) is a stock, while FSPSX (Fidelity International Index Fund) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Over the past 3 years, BMR returned -23.85%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for FSPSX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BMR vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMR achieves a -22.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 12.57% return.

BMR

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -15.38%
• 6M: -40.69%
• YTD: -22.93%
• 1Y: -59.93%
• 3Y*: -23.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -29.19%

FSPSX

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: 7.21%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 1Y: 26.28%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: 9.69%
• ALL TIME*: 8.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share	$81.57K	$96.73K	$134.08K
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BMR vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share	-22.93%	-68.09%	239.31%	-63.20%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	12.57%	31.98%	3.70%	11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BMR and FSPSX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023	0.22

Return for Risk

BMR vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMR

BMR Risk / Return Rank: 7
BMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BMR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BMR Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FSPSX

FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMR vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMR	FSPSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	1.62	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	2.29	-3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.29	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	2.20	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	8.33	-9.81

BMR vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMR and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BMR vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMR drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMR and FSPSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMR	FSPSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.67%	-33.69%	-58.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.24%	-11.39%	-52.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.67%	-13.58%	-79.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.48%	0.00%	-92.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.20%	-6.49%	-66.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.62%	3.00%	+37.62%

Volatility

BMR vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) has a higher volatility of 19.76% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.57%. This indicates that BMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMR	FSPSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.76%	4.57%	+15.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.54%	13.22%	+39.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.57%	15.52%	+54.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	236.98%	16.12%	+220.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	236.98%	16.29%	+220.69%

Dividends

BMR vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

BMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	2.80%	3.15%	3.27%	2.79%	2.66%	3.07%	1.84%	3.18%	2.79%	2.50%	3.08%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMR and FSPSX in my portfolio?

BMR and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMR or FSPSX?

BMR has higher volatility (19.76%) compared to FSPSX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMR dropped -92.67% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.