BMR vs. FSPSX
BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share) is a stock, while FSPSX (Fidelity International Index Fund) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Over the past 3 years, BMR returned -19.30%/yr vs 17.49%/yr for FSPSX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMR vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMR achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 10.16% return.
BMR
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -29.31%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- -52.17%
- 3Y*
- -19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
BMR vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | -8.60% | -68.09% | 239.31% | -63.20% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 10.16% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMR and FSPSX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMR vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
BMR
FSPSX
BMR vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMR | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.78 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 6.63 | -7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMR vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMR drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMR and FSPSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMR | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -33.69% | -58.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.03% | -11.39% | -51.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.80% | -13.58% | -78.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.08% | -1.34% | -89.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.86% | -6.51% | -66.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.69% | 3.05% | +38.64% |
Volatility
BMR vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) has a higher volatility of 24.52% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 5.19%. This indicates that BMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMR | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.52% | 5.19% | +19.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.44% | 13.07% | +37.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.89% | 15.49% | +53.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 238.89% | 16.10% | +222.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 238.89% | 16.28% | +222.61% |
Dividends
BMR vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
BMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 2.86% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMR and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMR has higher volatility (24.52%) compared to FSPSX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMR dropped -91.80% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.
FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMR and FSPSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer