BMR vs. AMSC
BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share) and AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) are both stocks. BMR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, BMR returned -23.85%/yr vs 22.11%/yr for AMSC. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BMR vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMR achieves a -22.93% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 2.05% return.
BMR
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -40.69%
- YTD
- -22.93%
- 1Y
- -59.93%
- 3Y*
- -23.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.19%
AMSC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -20.86%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- -45.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.27M | $25.36M | $48.11M | |
| $81.57K | $96.73K | $134.08K |
BMR vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | -22.93% | -68.09% | 239.31% | -63.20% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 2.05% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 111.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMR and AMSC is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BMR and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BMR:
$18.79M
AMSC:
$1.42B
BMR:
-$0.60
AMSC:
$2.95
BMR:
3.05
AMSC:
4.45
BMR:
1.19
AMSC:
2.47
BMR:
$6.16M
AMSC:
$299.15M
BMR:
$5.57M
AMSC:
$91.38M
BMR:
-$9.23M
AMSC:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMR vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
BMR
AMSC
BMR vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.94 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.79 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -1.21 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMR vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMR drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMR and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.67% | -99.57% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.24% | -61.08% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.67% | -61.08% | -31.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.48% | -95.76% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -75.83% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.62% | 40.10% | +0.52% |
Volatility
BMR vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) is 19.76%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.38%. This indicates that BMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMR | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.76% | 22.38% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.54% | 57.61% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.57% | 87.44% | -17.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 236.98% | 87.66% | +149.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 236.98% | 79.49% | +157.49% |
Dividends
BMR vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMR nor AMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BMR vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BMR and AMSC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.38%) compared to BMR (19.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMR dropped -92.67% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
AMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMR and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer