BMNU vs. MSII
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSII.
Performance
BMNU vs. MSII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -82.74% return, which is significantly lower than MSII's -28.10% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -18.33%
- 6M
- -85.30%
- YTD
- -82.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -29.85%
- YTD
- -28.10%
- 1Y
- -75.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. MSII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -82.74% | -80.88% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -28.10% | -51.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and MSII is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. MSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. MSII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than MSII's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and MSII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -78.73% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -78.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.89% | -76.65% | -21.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.57% | -48.03% | -33.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.38% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. MSII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.49% | 71.71% | +110.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.49% | 69.96% | +112.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.49% | 69.96% | +112.53% |
BMNU vs. MSII - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. MSII - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor MSII has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 76.94% | 48.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and MSII have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 76.94%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.99% for MSII.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and MSII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer