BLW vs. PFRL
BLW (BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust) is a stock, while PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) is Bank Loan fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 3 years, BLW returned 8.66%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for PFRL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLW vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLW achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than PFRL's 1.96% return.
BLW
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -5.77%
- 1Y
- -2.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
PFRL
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.91%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLW vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | -5.79% | 7.17% | 11.06% | 17.29% | 2.97% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 1.96% | 6.25% | 9.40% | 13.75% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLW and PFRL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2022 | 0.31 |
The correlation between BLW and PFRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLW vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank
BLW
PFRL
BLW vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLW | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.73 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 5.17 | -5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 17.58 | -18.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLW | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 3.35 | -3.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.67 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
BLW vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLW drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, which is greater than PFRL's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLW and PFRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLW | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.13% | -8.83% | -35.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -1.25% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.19% | -8.83% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -0.03% | -7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -0.44% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 0.37% | +3.06% |
Volatility
BLW vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) at 0.42%. This indicates that BLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLW | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 0.42% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.92% | 1.58% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 1.94% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.32% | 4.86% | +7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 4.86% | +9.73% |
Dividends
BLW vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison
BLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than PFRL's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | 10.95% | 9.89% | 9.39% | 8.63% | 8.26% | 6.99% | 7.39% | 6.27% | 7.14% | 6.24% | 9.68% | 8.26% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 6.83% | 7.34% | 8.96% | 9.84% | 3.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLW and PFRL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLW has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to PFRL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLW dropped -44.13% vs PFRL's -8.83%.
PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLW and PFRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer