BLW vs. CRF
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF).
CRF is managed by Cornerstone. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
BLW vs. CRF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLW vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | -5.97% | 7.17% | 11.06% | 17.29% | -15.92% | 13.52% | 5.36% | 31.08% | -10.22% | 11.53% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -8.05% | 12.46% | 44.39% | 19.49% | -36.70% | 39.73% | 28.13% | 21.74% | -11.74% | 21.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLW achieves a -5.97% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BLW has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 6.71%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.
BLW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -5.97%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- -1.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
CRF
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLW vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank
BLW
CRF
BLW vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLW | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.96 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | 1.47 | -1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 1.34 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 4.90 | -5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLW | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.96 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.23 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.05 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLW and CRF is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BLW vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison
BLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, less than CRF's 19.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | 10.78% | 9.89% | 9.39% | 8.63% | 8.26% | 6.99% | 7.39% | 6.27% | 7.14% | 6.24% | 9.68% | 8.26% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.94% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
Drawdowns
BLW vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLW drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLW and CRF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLW | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.13% | -80.70% | +36.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -14.88% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -43.12% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -45.90% | +4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -9.74% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -22.39% | +16.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 4.08% | -1.68% |
Volatility
BLW vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) is 5.70%, while Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that BLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLW | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 7.96% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 12.73% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 20.15% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 25.82% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 25.86% | -11.28% |