BLW vs. CRF

In the year-to-date period, BLW achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BLW has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 6.86%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.11% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLW and CRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, less than CRF's 19.10% yield.

The maximum BLW drawdown since its inception was -44.58%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -78.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLW and CRF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) is 3.30%, while Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that BLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.