BLW vs. MAGS
BLW (BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, BLW returned 8.29%/yr vs 28.94%/yr for MAGS. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BLW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLW
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 1Y
- -1.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.26%
MAGS
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 35.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.19M | $2.30M | $1.94M | |
| $254.73M | $303.60M | $278.63M |
BLW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | -2.99% | 7.17% | 11.06% | 13.17% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.00% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLW and MAGS is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
BLW
MAGS
BLW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.77 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 2.26 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLW drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLW and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.13% | -29.91% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -18.62% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.19% | -29.91% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -7.02% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -4.86% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 6.31% | -2.02% |
Volatility
BLW vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) is 2.01%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that BLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 8.02% | -6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | 17.37% | -10.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.19% | 22.30% | -14.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 26.09% | -13.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 26.09% | -11.51% |
Dividends
BLW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
BLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.83%, more than MAGS's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | 10.83% | 9.89% | 9.39% | 8.63% | 8.26% | 6.99% | 7.39% | 6.27% | 7.14% | 6.24% | 9.68% | 8.26% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.48% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to BLW (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLW dropped -44.13% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLW and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer