BLOK vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

BLOK vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 27.49%
• 3Y*: 48.25%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	14.77%	3.30%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and CIFU is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	—	—

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-77.20%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.27%	-10.48%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-42.93%	+16.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.10%	207.07%	-167.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.53%	207.07%	-164.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.03%	207.07%	-168.04%

BLOK vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and CIFU in my portfolio?

BLOK and CIFU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or CIFU?

On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or CIFU?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or CIFU?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between BLOK and CIFU?

BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 1.50% for CIFU.