BLOK vs. BATT
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK returned 10.22%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for BATT. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.
Performance
BLOK vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 3.91% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.03%
BATT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $677.09K | $717.59K | $1.32M | |
| $12.12M | $10.76M | $19.14M |
BLOK vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 4.30% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | 30.76% | 90.17% | 29.54% | -27.23% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 3.91% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and BATT is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BLOK and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
BLOK vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLOK
BATT
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BLOK
BATT
Technology
BLOK
BATT
Consumer Cyclical
BLOK
BATT
Communication Services
BLOK
BATT
Industrials
BLOK
BATT
Real Estate
BLOK
BATT
-
Basic Materials
BLOK
-
BATT
Consumer Defensive
BLOK
-
BATT
-
Energy
BLOK
-
BATT
-
Healthcare
BLOK
-
BATT
-
Utilities
BLOK
-
BATT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
BATT
BLOK vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.25 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.13 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 6.06 | -6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than BATT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and BATT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -69.38% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -23.02% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | -45.26% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | -61.98% | -11.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -20.47% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -34.40% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.28% | 8.08% | +9.20% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 10.06%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.31% | 10.06% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.77% | 28.05% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.21% | 33.66% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.50% | 30.00% | +12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.06% | 30.78% | +8.28% |
BLOK vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BATT's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.78% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.82% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and BATT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to BATT (10.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs BATT's -69.38%.
On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 10.22% vs -2.05% for BATT. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BATT has been the lower-risk option at 10.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 10.22% return vs -2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.
BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.82% for BLOK.
BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.59% for BATT.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and BATT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer